Terror on the tube

A good website to start researching details of the 7/7 bombings.Nick Kollerstrom tears apart the official story.He presents a detailed analysis based on a wealth of information that will leave you astounded.

Members: 11
Latest Activity: Sep 11, 2013

Discussion Forum

Israeli Terror threat to London Olympics - Nick Kollerstrom

Started by Deborah Williams. Last reply by sand Jul 10, 2012. 1 Reply

From   Nick Kollerstrom's website Terror on the Tube 27th June 2012The security firm to ‘look after’ the forthcoming London Olympics, G4S, has deep Israeli connections and a dreadful human rights…Continue

Tags: 2012Olympics, FalseFlagAttack, G4S, NickKollerstrom, Tube

New edition of Terror on the Tube

Started by Deborah Williams Jan 18, 2012. 0 Replies

The new, 3rd edition of my book is now available.  Amazon is…Continue

Tags: KentFreedomMovement, TerrorOnTheTube3rdEdition, NickKollerstrom

Comment Wall

Comment by Deborah Williams on July 16, 2011 at 17:46

How the Tavistock Square bus blew its top

From Nick Kollerstrom's site Terror on the tube

The roof neatly lifted off, when the No. 30 bus blew up in Tavistock Square, that morning.  A bit too neatly.

It had been cut.

We can see the cut-line along the base of the upper roof support:

This was discovered by the American Simon Shack, in October 2010 –  
it seems that no-one noticed it earlier. Two of his images are here used, with kind permission.

Compare this image (which you may want to view here, in high-resolution) with a newly-released image of the whole, exploded bus that was shown at the Inquest (see below). Why was this image not released earlier? Maybe because it shows too well the dead-level top surface after the blast, which would have given the game away. Surely, that line was pre-cut, to make sure that the roof easily lifted off.

A scientific approach to the problem should involve taking a bus and blowing it up with a bomb at the back of the top deck, and seeing if the top lifts off. Would it? I doubt it very much, certainly not in the neatly-cut fashion we see here.

The pressure was enough to cause bleeding noses on the top deck, but not enough to make anyone deaf by their eardrums being destroyed (or, please post a comment if I’m wrong here). At such a pressure, I suggest that beforehand the whole top of the bus had to be nearly cut off, and ready to lift.

We notice how at the top of the corner-strut in the picture, the top of the bus came off leaving an irregular shaped tear, in contrast with the level saw-mark at the bottom,

Moving down a bit from that saw-mark, one sees the serial number of the bus, 17758 (on the date, 7/7/05). Well, fancy that.

The bus displays the well-known advert for the horror-movie ‘The Descent,’ which opened on July 8th (!). The film’s promoters (Wikipedia tells us) had to quickly alter the adverts, because: ‘ ”people were still trapped underground in reality, so no one really wanted to go see a film about people trapped underground…” Yes, indeed, it was ‘Outright terror, bold and brilliant,‘ just as the advert stated.

Hasib Hussein wasn’t on that bus.

No Muslim terrorist blew it up.

Whoever blew it up, first sawed the edge of the top deck. We recall the (anonymous) testimony from someone claiming to work for the bus company ‘Stagecoach’ of people tinkering with the bus during the previous weekend:

Last saturday a contractor came to inspect the CCTV on the buses at the depot, according to my supervisor the person spent more than 20 hours over that weekend, 20 hours to see if the CCTV is working? Also that person who came was not a regular contractor, for security reasons the same few people always come to the depot to carry out work, this time it was different … Was the mammoth 20 hour inspection session of the CCTV a means of disabling the CCTV, or something even darker? Were the contractors, who were not familiar to the bus company employees, actually placing the bomb?

The saw-mark would also have been visible on the lifted-off bit of roof, which crashed onto the road in front of the bus. For comparison here is also a picture of the same bus type, so you can see where it was sawn-off prior to the 7/7 explosion. It’s tragic that that roof-top was just destroyed, and not kept for the Inquest, so that everyone could have seen the saw-marks.

An Engineer’s Opinion

I have an old friend who used to work for British Aerospace as an engineer. I showed him the above photos, and he commented as follows.

Of the side-on image showing the dead level tear-line along the top of the bus:  several uprights from between the windows should have remained there, bent outwards from the explosion but still attached. The struts he reckoned were made of aluminium rather than steel. It would be hard to ask the bus-manufacturing company  for comments because it was probably in Italy or somewhere (‘Margaret Thatcher scrapped UK vehicle manufacturing’, trains & buses are all made abroad).

Of the horizontal cut in the strut shown, he said its top and bottom surfaces followed a parallel fracture-line indicating it had been made by a cut not an explosion. Also it was not twisted or stretched, which further indicated a cut by a saw. It would have bulged outwards had it been torn by the explosion, and would not have the matching edges top & bottom.

It had been made by a heavy power-saw not a hand saw, of the kind which the police use quite a lot eg to rescue people trapped in crashed vehichles.  

An independent body of engineers should have been called to assess it, especially the blown-off top section. Sections should have been examined, especially for an accident with a ‘public service vehicle.’ After a crash, industries spend thousands on recovering the parts (eg dredging a plane out of the ocean) and reassembling them in a massive hangar, to check where the fractures occurred. He found it highly suspicious that the police should throw away such crucial evidence without having engineers examine it. Accident engineers are normally the first people allowed on such a crash scene. He estimated a pressure of 25 psi for the roof to lift off, compared with 14 psi normal atmospheric pressure.

The bar curled around the strut looked like a chromium-plated passenger-safety bar. Then, while the two of us were walking along the Euston Road, he pointed out that buses, only some buses, had just such a bar down the left-hand front corner! Oddly enough I had never noticed this before. It was probably for safety so that staff could get up on the roof for cleaning, he surmised. We agreed that the bottom of those chrome ‘handles’ were above where the saw-mark had been made.

Admittedly, that did not quite explain the snake-like shape of the bar in Tavistock Square, but it was a good start…

Taken  to Fort Halstead

The remains of that 30 bus were taken to the British Army’s research establishment at Fort Halstead, Sevenoaks. The Forensic Explosives Laboratory at fort Halstead aims, ‘to identify enemies’ explosives, and to find the means to counter them.’

 It’s a large military site, over a square mile, and maybe the bus is still there.

My source came up to me after I’d given a talk to the Kent Freedom Movement, at Gravesend on 14th April, 2011. A pal with him who worked for the same delivery company vouched for him. He seemed quite genuine.

Fort Halstead at Sevenoaks (Crow Lane, Badger’s Mount) has long been headquarters of the Royal Armament Research and Development Establishment, it’s where bombs are made. It does forensic analysis into explosives and supposedly analysed the bomb material for both the 7/7 and 21/7 explosions. It employs over 1000 personell. Especially Clifford Todd, who is principal forensic investigator at the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) at Fort Halstead, advised the Inquest about explosives: he earlier seeded the absurd ‘black pepper and peroxide’ bomb story at the 2008 ‘July 7th’ trial at Kingston.

My source he had visited the site a dozen or so times. He had to show two IDs to gain entrance, his passport and driving licence. An escort about 60 years old ushered him in, for his delivery, and there assured him that the 30 bus from Tavistock Square had been brought here, sometime after July 7th. He added, ‘they make bombs here.’ My source could see bombs being driven past him, on crates and palettes. All the people there seemed to be either army types, in uniform, or police. He talked to a roofer, who was doing some work on underground bunkers there, where one could only see the roofs of the buildings.

Comment by Deborah Williams on July 16, 2011 at 17:50

Source of terror threat is in UK Government, says a police Principal Intelligence Analyst

From Nick Kollerstrom's site 'Terror on the tube'


Tony Farrell had been employed for twelve years as ‘Principle Intelligence Analyst’ for South Yorkshire Police, 13th largest of the 44 police forces in the UK. His job involved producing a yearly ‘Strategic Threat Assessment Matrix’ to determine how the police force had to prioritise its activities. Assessed ‘threats’ ranged from ASBOs (anti-social behaviour orders) to the terrorist threat allegedly presented by Islamic extremists. Having a statistics degree, it was his job to translate the different ‘strategic threats’ into a ‘matrix’ of relative numerical weighted probabilities.

In 2010, one week before the 5th anniversary of 7/7, Tony (who had never previously doubted government versions of events) stumbled across ‘9/11 Truth’ material on the web. Like so many millions before him, he was shocked to the core by this experience. He quickly realised that there was a great mass of evidence relating to 9/11 kept hidden by the mainstream media. As a Christian, Tony consulted his church minister, who suggested that he consider, whether the same might be true for the London 7/7 bombings?  

Something he had not suspected ‘in his wildest dreams’ then started to unfold. After reading much of the available but publicly-unreported witness statements and other evidence relating to 7/7, Tony found that he could only conclude that the official 7/7 narrative was ‘a monstrous lie.’ Instead of the official ‘suicide bombers’ narrative, which he and all of his colleagues had believed without question, he realised that the weight of evidence strongly points far more towards 7/7 being an event stage-managed by British intelligence than anything else.

The unthinkable but inescapable question thus intruded: Does there exist an ‘internal tyranny’ worse than any external foe?

All the assumptions he had held about the ‘strategic threat’ from terrorism were shattered and lay in ruins, and he found himself now doubting the size of any threat allegedly coming from Al-Qaeda and home-grown extremists.  Within the police service, he felt horribly alone not knowing who to talk to about this matter – a situation made acute because he would have to present his annual threat assessment to the ‘Intelligence Strategic Management Board’ on July 8th -  mere days away.

From his Christian perspective 9/11 and 7/7 could only now be perceived as expressions of a Satanic dimension concerning the ascent of what everybody was calling a ‘New World Order’. He saw these deceitful events as false-flag operations perpetrated in order to justify illegal and wicked wars. This was a deep personal crisis – one that would terminate his career.

On July 6th he ‘stuck his head above the parapet’ by alerting his boss – that he was developing a very different conceptual model of the strategic threat.

The terse document he handed over, suggested that the untruth of the 9/11 story implied ‘a huge potential for a total breakdown in trust between the government and the masses’ and it warned of ‘a tipping-point’ that would surely arrive as it slowly dawned upon citizens that their own government had conspired against them and had lied to them and had murdered innocents in the process.

Likewise he warned that, if indeed 7/7 had been ‘deliberately engineered’ to justify British PM Tony Blair standing shoulder to shoulder with Bush in the illegal was in Iraq, ‘There will be total outrage within the masses and a complete breakdown of trust between the Government and the people of the UK.’

In the presence of two intelligence managers, he alerted the Detective Superintendent, the Director of Intelligence for the South Yorkshire Police, explaining that all of his work used open-source material – he was not violating ‘official secrets’. He alluded to secret societies and a Masonic influence as being very central. The Director of Intelligence distanced the other two managers and they held a one-to-one conversation. The biggest single threat to the UK, Tony Farrell explained to him, was now coming from internal tyranny and in his opinion ‘far exceeded’ any threat from Islamic terrorism. ‘Tony, you and I will never get them to tell the truth’, came the philosophical reply, ‘- we are mere foot-soldiers of the government.’

That indeed was sensible advice, from someone who cared for his welfare – but, something more important was stirring within Tony Farrell: the voice of his conscience, and that would not permit him to go along with the ‘monstrous lie’.

His seniors, seemingly concerned for his well-being expressed a wish for Tony to visit Occupational Health. This irked him, as he felt and indeed was in perfectly good health.

On July 7th 2010, his first line manager, a Detective Chief Inspector spent a good part of the day with him trying to steer him into keeping to the original plan and to avoid rocking the boat. Could they not achieve some sort of compromise – then he could take his three weeks’ leave? To comply with that, he would have had turn a blind eye to his own assessment and deliberately hand over misleading analysis. His ‘strategic’ models were looking promising according to his line manager – yet he could not set aside his new views about ‘internal tyranny.’

As a seemingly lone voice in his police force, Tony Farrell found himself wrestling in the ‘Valley of Decision’ at home that evening, a theme he found expressed in the Book of Joel, Chapter 3. He also pondered the 9th Commandment, ‘Thou shalt not bear false witness.’ He experienced an epic struggle going on that seemed to him to resemble that described in the Book of Ephesians, Chapter 6.

So that evening, 5 years to the day from the London bombings, he reached his own momentous personal decision. He resolved to take a stand knowing it would probably lead to him being sacked.

On July 8th he handed over a very short version of the ‘Strategic Assessment Matrix,’ which averred that the real terrorist ‘threat’ to society was almost entirely of the state-sponsored kind, and it alluded to both 9/11 and 7/7 in this context. Other threats from other ‘domains of criminality’ were, his brief report claimed, ‘insignificant’ by comparison.

This was hardly following the National Intelligence Model guidance, relating to ‘Threat and Risk Assessment models’ that he was supposed to use.  ‘Tony we can’t do business like this,’ his manager pleaded.

He was asked to create a personal report: how had he arrived as such an unheard-of view? His privileges were withdrawn and his computer accessed, but as he had done his investigation at home and with open-source material, nothing untoward was found.

And so he was absent from the board meeting that afternoon, even though it was anticipating the yearly presentation from him. Instead he was sent home to compile a report, explaining his stance. He offered to produce a full report with backup evidence, for his shocking new views, but that wasn’t required.

Sacked for his beliefs

His work ‘could be helpful to the police service’ the DI remarked cryptically. Everything had happened so quickly, much too quickly. Tony Farrell was summoned to a hearing chaired by the Director of Finance a member of the Senior Command Team on 2nd September 2010.  He was told that he held beliefs that were ‘incompatible’ with his position.  There was no allegation of any misconduct. In dismissing him, the Director of Finance said this: “It is a very sad occasion as you have done some excellent work for South Yorkshire Police and I have never been involved in a situation like today. Your beliefs are very sincere and you may be right, but it is I’m afraid incompatible at the moment with where we are.”

He took the matter to the South Yorkshire Police Authority Appeal’s Committee but his case was dismissed.   He has since put the case into an Employment Tribunal where final hearings are scheduled to be held in early September 2011 in Sheffield. This will be a public event, and it is likely that South Yorkshire Police will feel embarrassed by the repercussions. This case has potentially far-reaching implications.

For a discussion of his legal case, see here.

Tony Farrell gave an interview with Richard Hall on Sky TV released on July 8, 2011 (used as the main source for this article) and also that same day a 10-minute interview was broadcast on a Bristol local radio; synchronously enough, South Yorkshire’s Chief Constable announced his retirement on that same day 8th July – after nine years’ of service. Was this indicating some stress within the Force?  The whole story focuses by odd coincidences upon anniversary-dates of the London bombings, over the last couple of years.

Support for Tony Farrell

Anyone wishing to help Tony to continue with his legal appeal, please email
He can then give you his paypal email. This is a temporary situation, until his website is up and running, with its Paypal account.


Comment by Deborah Williams on October 2, 2011 at 2:16

False-Flag Terror in Norway?


- 77 dead -

Was Anders Breivic (AB) a Zionist, who massacred the children in response to Norway’s anti-Israel stance? Or, did he do it for the reason he stated, namely that too many Muslims were flooding into Norway?  

The media have taken the latter view, while some eg Adrian Salbucci, have taken the former.

Norway’s Labour party had passed resolutions on this matter just a day or two before. The day before the event, “Norway’s Foreign Minister was met with claims that Norway must recognize a Palestinian state when he visited the Labour Youth League summer camp: The Palestinians must have their own state, the occupation must end, the wall must be demolished and it must happen now, said the Foreign Minister to cheers from the audience.” As Breivik and his fellow operative made their way onto Utøya Island, the teenage Labor Youth activists “were chanting for BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) against Israel.” 

AB published a long manifesto on the web, where the Jerusalem Post found that in 1,500 pages AB mentioned Israel 359 times and “Jews” 324 times. Condemning Muslims, Marxism and multiculturalism, he espoused what the newspaper describes as “far-right Zionism.”  For example:

So let us fight together with Israel, with our Zionist brothers against all anti-Zionists, against all cultural Marxists/multiculturalists”

 There is a deep ambiguity here. Did AB act – as clearly stated in his ‘Declaration’ – because of the threat of an ever-growing Islamic population, that will he estimates soon swamp traditional Norwegian culture, by somewhere about 2060? On this view, he feels friendly towards Jews primarily because he is anti-Muslim. And this view implies that he did the massacre and let off the bomb(s) in Oslo all by himself. - Or, as conspiracy theorists are averring, was he ‘manipulated’ and was the act primarily against the state of Norway, for its anti-Israel stance? On this view, he did not act alone. I suggest that we do not currently know the answer to this.  

A Lone nut?

The media are trying to tell us that a single ‘lone nut’ blew up two government buildings in central Oslo – leaving ‘debris over half a kilometer’ – then rushed over to an island 90 kilometers away, mysteriously acquiring a police uniform, then single-handedly shot down seventy people. Some Rambo indeed! But eyewitnesses saw at least two terrorists on their shooting spree, at the Utøya summer youth camp outside of Oslo.

The shootings were coming from “two different places on the island at the same time,” according to several eyewitnesses, in the Norwegian newspaper ‘VG’. The second was described as 180 centimetres tall, dark-haired man with Nordic appearance and “a pistol in his right hand and a rifle on his back.” One witness described how these two ‘always made sure that their victims were dead.’

A car bomb? Don't think so ...

When it was over AB quietly allowed his own capture -  like Mark Chapman or David Hinckley before him. Suddenly his Facebook page was changed, while he was in custody, who did that? The ‘Christian’ theme was added in. The police took an inordinately long time to arrive on the island, over 90 minutes – and then immediately knew AB’s name: AB surrendered and came quietly when they just called his name!  

Initially the story broke as Islamic terror, then it turned out that AB was blonde and blue-eyed: suddenly he was no longer a ‘terrorist’ and instead became a far-right ‘lunatic’ and ‘madman.’

The date of 22nd July has two important ‘echoes’: firstly, the blowing up of the King David hotel in Palestine, killing 91 Britons, on 22 July 1946 – organised by Menachim Begin who subsequently gained a Nobel Peace prize and became Israeli Prime Minister; and secondly, it has of late been designated as the ‘International day of action against Israeli aggression.’ 

No car bomb

The huge blast was heard by people at least 7km away: it caused extensive damage to a complex of government buildings housing the prime minister’s office and the ministries of finance, justice and petroleum. The US site Veterans Today has received reports from sources in Oslo indicating that the bomb, now believed to be equal to more than 10 tons of TNT, was not a car bomb.  Reports indicate that “sewer workers” had been accessing the site during the days prior to the explosion, which is now estimated, were conventional explosives to have been used, to have required enough “fertilizer slurry” explosive to have filled a rail car. The explosion is estimated to resemble that of the Marine Barracks in Beirut in 1983, killing over 200 or the Oklahoma City bombing

 was the bombng a swift reaction to the Norwegian boycott-Israel campaign? AB’s last email an hour before was to a Jewish friend in an Israeli Kibbutz. 

A view of the event as false-flag terror given by US commentator Wayne Madsen,  begins, ‘Israel’s most secret and tried-and-true weapon is the “false flag” terrorist attack.’  That’s true enough, but does it apply here? In case it does, here is Wayne Madsen’s conclusion:

Mossad is a master at false-flag terrorist attacks designed to alter perceptions and punish opponents of Israeli policy. The fingerprints of Israeli intelligence are all over the 9/11 attacks on the United States, the 3/22 train bombings in Madrid, the 7/7 transit bombings in London, and, now, the 7/22 attacks in Norway… While the Israeli-influenced corporate media has droned on and on about the dangers of Islamist terrorism, it is now obvious that the major threat to public safety comes from the State of Israel, a rogue nation that does not hesitate to murder the innocent to achieve its sordid political aims.

 Israel has accused the Norwegian government of funding and encouraging blatant anti-Israel incitement. It is the premier organizer of Palestinian statehood today. According to reports received by the Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem, the Trondheim Municipality is funding a trip to New York for students taking part in the “Gaza Monologues” play, which “deals with the suffering of children in Gaza as a result of the Israeli occupation:”

The play, written by a Palestinian from Gaza, will be presented at the United Nations headquarters. It joins an exhibition by a Norwegian artists displayed in Damascus, Beirut, and Amman, with the help of Norway’s embassies in Syria,Lebanon, and Jordan.

The exhibition shows killed Palestinian babies next to Israel Defense Forces helmets, which are reminiscent of Nazi soldiers’ helmets, and an Israeli flag drenched in blood.

Its commendable that Norway is taking such constructive actions against the terrorist state that is modern Israel. But, have they just  paid a price for this?

Concerning this deeply-censored event, where we may never know the truth of what happened, let’s conclude with a quote from Webster Tarpley, taing the view that it was in fact, false-flag terror: 

 It is reported that, although the world media are attempting to focus on Anders Behring Breivik as a lone assassin in the tradition of Lee Harvey Oswald, many eyewitnesses agree that a second shooter was active in the massacre at the Utøya summer youth camp outside of Oslo. It has also come to light that a special police unit had conducted drills or exercises near the opera house in downtown Oslo which involved the detonation of bombs during 2010– exactly what caused the bloodshed a few hundred meters away this Friday. Further research reveals that United States intelligence agencies had been conducting a large-scale program of recruiting retired Norwegian police officers with the alleged purpose of conducting surveillance inside the country. This program, known as SIMAS Surveillance Detection Units, provided a perfect vehicle for the penetration and subversion of the Norwegian police by NATO.

If indeed ‘subversion’ of Norwegian police took place, maybe that would explain the ‘stand-down’ of twenty search-and-rescue ‘counter-terrorism’ helicopters nearby – rather reminiscient of 9/11 – and instead the police drove out to the island and eventually found a  leaky boat. They didn’t have an ‘operative helicopter’ available. Uh-huh. 

A media helicopter was there before the police arrived. Distraught parents, getting messages from their children who were being shot, discovered they could not get the local police to act (discussion here:  two very clued-up persons discussing the matter).


9/11 – 2001, New York

11/3 – 2004,  Madrid   (911 days after 9/11)

7/7   -  2005, London

11/7  – 2006  Mumbai         ( 7 trains blown up over 11 minutes)

22/7  – 2011  Norway

With a final estimated total dead of 77, its hard to avoid the impression that somethng funny is going on here.

No bomb crater – nor CCTV released

What is supposed to be the epicentre of the Oslo 22/7 blast, was a main road, where no-one could see any wrecked car, or a crater (see eg here). People started to write into Norwegian newspapers, pointing this out, and then on the 28th, SIX DAYS LATER, an image of a huge crater was released. This was very close to the main government building, more or less inside it. CCTV that would resolve this matter is being withheld…. where have we heard that before? 

There were also reports of a lot of black helicopters swarming around Oslo shortly before the bomb went off.

Helpful hints to Norwegians: One urgent challenge, is to identify what exploded in Oslo. On his farm, can traces be found of the aluminium he ground up, with the ‘fertiliser’? If so, a test of that going bang, if anyone can make it go bang, and a comparison with the explosion in central Oslo, would be helpful. Video sequences show no hint of a car that blew up. Do not endorse the media and government calls for more surveillance (and microchips) in reponse to the event. Mossad and MI6 agents have been invited by the Norwegian government, to come along and ‘help’ solve the matter: that’s like putting a shark in charge of the swimming-pool. 

Here is another sequence, showing the enormous power of the huge blast in Oslo -  but no crater where the centre is supposed to be – nor the remains of a large VW van. Six days later a crater was found!

A ‘terror drill’ shadowed this event: “Oslo police were conducting a bombing exercise at a location near the Oslo Opera House just 48 hours before a terrorist blast hit a government building in the Norwegian capital. According to the translated version of an Aftenposten report, ‘Anti-terror police fired explosive charges at a training center in Oslo, two hundred meters from the Opera, but forgot to notify the public.’” False-flag terror events normally are normally accompanied by some kind of ‘terror drill.’

Helpful blogger comment:

“The connection between Zionism and the Norway mass murder appears to me vastly stretched. Apart from some rantings by the murderer, there is no hard evidence of any links between him and Israel or Zionist organisations. As in any case of murder, the focus should remain – at least at the outset – on forensic evidence, direct witness testimonies and a thorough and transparent investigation of When, Where, What, Who and How. Possible motives can help focus an investigation, but cannot supplant it. Here are some relevant questions for which I still await an answer:

“1. Could a non-skilled person construct – without harm to himself – such a powerful bomb as was used in Oslo? And design the remote-control necessary for such an operation? Are there precedents that prove that this is easily within reach of an amateur?

“2. What is known about the murderer moving the bomb into place, obtaining (or buying) a vehicle, placing the bomb at the right site, changing his uniform, driving to Utöya, where did he hid his ammunition and weapon while on the ferry, how did he manage to kill so many people, one after the other?

“3. Why did it take the police 90 minutes to arrive at Utöya, when it is told that people are being murdered? That’s far longer than an ambulance or a firefighter team would take. Is it some kind of severe negligence by the police, or something more sinister? If negligence, aren’t we entitled to know WHOSE negligence?

“I therefore recommend that a public inquiry into the circumstances of Utöya be held, with truly independent commissionsers, including representatives of the victims. Since 9/11 there is no reason to trust any state agency to investigate such crimes. Western governments, due to their cover-up of 9/11 have forfeited the trust of the populations”.     - emmett23 sier   Hear, hear!

‘Captain America’ opens – 22 July

Is there any connection with the new US blockbuster opening around the world generally on the same day 22nd of July? Its said to have thematic similarities with a Norwegian theme – if you’ve seen it, please post a comment!  Remember the UK horror film ‘The Descent’ about people trapped underground had to be delayed from its scheduled launch date 8.7.05, because of 7/7. Quoting Webster Tarpley, ‘

‘No terrorist attack would be complete without the advance airing of a scenario docudrama to provide the population with a conceptual scheme to help them understand the coming events in the sense intended by the oligarchy.’ (Tarpley, Synthetic Terror, p.408).

See also Timeline


Comment by Deborah Williams on October 22, 2011 at 0:06

Comment by Deborah Williams on March 4, 2012 at 16:55

Washington DC: FBI Foils Own Terror Plot (Again)

FBI’s nation-wide stable of patsies can be switched “live” at any moment
by Tony Cartalucci

February 18. 2012 – The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has once again proven that the only thing Americans need fear, is their own government, with the latest “terror attack” foiled being one entirely of their own design.USA Today reports that a suspect had been arrested by the FBI who was “en route to the U.S. Capitol allegedly to detonate a suicide bomb.” While initial reports portrayed the incident as a narrowly averted terrorist attack, CBS would report that a “high ranking source told CBS News the man was “never a real threat.”" The explosives the would-be bomber carried were provided to him by the FBI during what they described as a “lengthy and extensive operation.” The only contact the suspect had with “Al Qaeda” was with FBI officials posing as associates of the elusive, omnipresent, bearded terror conglomerate. The FBI, much like their MI5 counterparts in England, have a propensity for recruiting likely candidates from mosques they covertly run.

This is but the latest in a string of national terror plots carried out from start to finish by the FBI, who has made a business of approaching likely candidates and grooming them to carry out terror attacks. In September 2011, another FBI terror operation targeting the Capitol was “foiled,” involving a patsy who believed he was to take part in an assault that would involve multiple gunmen and even a drone bomber provided to him by the FBI.

And perhaps the most dubious of all, was the December 2010 Portland “Christmas Tree Bomber,” who was also approached by the FBI, provided demolition training, including a demonstration with live explosives performed in a Lincoln County park, and a van within which the patsy believed his handlers had provided him a bomb. The van with the inert device was parked next to a crowded Christmas tree lighting ceremony where the patsy attempted to detonate it remotely before being arrested by FBI agents.

It would later turn out that Portland had heroically withdrew from the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force, (JTTF), with the operation then being carried out behind Portland Mayor Sam Adam’s back only for its conclusion to humiliatingly catch the mayor off guard. The city of Portland would eventually rejoin the JTTF after the fallout from the FBI’s own terror plot.

The FBI is carrying out what is essentially a campaign of entrapment fueling what alternative news outlet Media Monarchy appropriately calls “terronoia.” And while it is true that these incidents are being used to foment a climate of fear to justify the ongoing “War on Terror,” there is a more sinister implication readers must be aware of.

In 1993 the FBI was carrying out an identical “sting operation” in New York City. The target was the World Trade Center, the weapon of choice would be a bomb-laden van, that like the above mentioned attacks, was supposed to contain an inert device. Helping the FBI was an Egyptian informant, Emad Salem, who over the course of the investigation grew suspicious of the federal agents and began recording his phone conversations with them.

From these recordings released by the New York Times, it turns out that the FBI switched out the inert device for real explosives at the last moment resulting in an attack that killed 6 and injured over a thousand. Despite this evidence, the 1993 bombing is still to this day attributed to “terrorists” with the FBI’s involvement muted if ever mentioned.

The implications are of course, with the FBI’s current nationwide stable of patsies being trained, directed, and provided material support to carry out attacks the FBI then “foils,” is at any given moment, any one of these operations can be switched “live” just as in 1993. The resulting carnage can then be used to manipulate public opinion just as it was in 1993, 2001, on 7/7 in London, and in Madrid, Spain in 2004.

Paying Tax and State-sponsored Terrorism

A person commits an offence if he (a) provides moneyor other property and (b) knows or has reasonable cause to suspect that it will or may be used for the purposes of terrorism.’      UK Terrorism Act 2000

It is Mr Tony Rooke’s argument, that this Act makes it an offense to pay tax to the UK Government, given its obvious complicity in Terrorism: What do you think?

The Newburgh Four

 June 2011: No-one was harmed – but Muslims get jailed for 25 years each, allegedly intending to blow up a New York City synagogue – hmm, where have we heard that one before? Three of them have been convicted of plotting to blow up worship houses in the Bronx and shoot down planes at a National Air Guard Base. Defense attorneys, however, argued that the three men are the victims of an entrapment perpetrated by the FBI.

The defense claims that an FBI informant posed as a recruiter for a terrorist organization and offered the men special Stinger missiles to take down planes at Stewart. Attorneys attest that the introduction of Stingers in the case calls for a minimum sentence of 25 years. “The government, not the defendants, chose Stewart Air Force base, and the government, not the defendants, introduced and supplied the missiles,” writes one of the attorneys for the defense.

Their legal team also attests that Shahed Hussain worked with the FBI and purposely picked the men up and drove them into Connecticut to obtain weapons to be used in the attacks. FBI Special Agent Robert Fuller has explicitly stated during the trial that they picked the Connecticut warehouse solely to get the Newburgh 4 to cross state lines. “The entire trip to Connecticut and the missiles were introduced by the government for the singular purpose of securing a 25-year minimum sentence,” say defense attorneys.

The Newburgh 4 are guilty of falling for a trick enacted by their own government.

Comment by Deborah Williams on July 9, 2012 at 21:03

7/7 Kollerstrom and Farrell are dead

Comment by Deborah Williams on June 10, 2013 at 19:10

Comment by Deborah Williams on June 10, 2013 at 19:11

Comment by Deborah Williams on June 12, 2013 at 1:31

Kent Freedom Movement investigate the Woolwich false flag psy ops PT1

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Terror on the tube to add comments!


Members (11)


Support your KFM

Money Quote

The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity.

Abraham Lincoln



Kent Freedom Movement is a grass roots organisation of people who want to bring important information to the people of Kent.

Money quote

In the beginning there was barter,

then there was money,

then there was money & debt,

then there was only debt –

and deception.





Awake Radio

© 2016   Created by Eddie Boyce.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service